« forgetful | Main | Ceci n'est pas Montréal »
March 27, 2006
Public Knitting Humiliation Part 2
You didn't miss Part 1. I'm going to have to do this like Star Wars and show the beginning later because I can't find my very first project though I'm sure I kept it.
I had finished a scarf, which I was very proud of and was now ready to move on to bigger and better things, like a sweater. In complete ignorance of the existence of yarn stores "Yarn comes from craft stores and those big walmart/kmart type places" I thought I went to one of the -marts and bought yarn to make a sweater. How much did I need? I didn't know. What I was making? I didn't know. I bought some yarn and went to the library - the only place I knew to get knitting patterns. As you might imagine, this being the early 90s, knitting was not hot and there was little to choose from, a Vogue book from the 80s, a Maggie Righetti book, things that wouldn't appeal to a 16 year old. So I took them home, looked through the patterns, and never having worked from a pattern was quickly bored, annoyed and uninspired. I figured I knew how to knit, I knew how to purl, what else was there to know?! ...um, hello, Kate... what about increases, decreases and gauge for starters? One of the patterns I came across made the whole body in one piece, sleeves and everything. I thought that made sense since I didn't know how I was going to be able sew this up on my mom's sewing machine ha! so I decided to do that. I cast on a bunch of sts. Just a bunch. You know, until it looked like enough. And I had heard of that gauge thing but I didn't know what it was and was too lazy to read those chapters so I just ignored it. I started knitting. And I knitted and I knitted. At one point, I realized that I had gone too far to make sleeves so I figured I would just stick those on later somehow and started the neck instead. Using some graph paper, I charted out a circle that would fit over my head. No, the size of the squares on this paper had no relation to the size of the stitches in my sweater. Of course not... I actually remember sitting on the floor with a piece of graph paper on my head - whatadork. I was really proud of my circle-neck thing and was so excited to finish the back. And I knit one sleeve too before realizing that my sweater was really wide not to mention hideous and just abandonning it. Here's what I ended up with:

keep in mind it was not going to be a poncho and I probably weighed 110 pounds soaking wet at the time, in other words, less than now
And since I've already begun the humiliation, let it continue:

I look like a big enough dork without showing you how my pixie haircut is growing out into a mullet so I cut off the top of my head
Let the public ridicule/stoning begin. For those who would prefer to copy my accidental poncho from before ponchos were cool, it's made in Lion Brand Wool Ease. Make sure you sit with the graph paper on your head. It's an important step.
Posted by kate at March 27, 2006 10:51 PM
Comments
Looove your story!!! Thanks for sharing.
I guess, I was always engineering-minded, pattern never frightened me. But then I grew up with sewing patterns all around.
Posted by: Lara900 at April 14, 2006 05:42 AM
That is so incredibly awesome.
Posted by: Gwen at April 13, 2006 10:59 PM
You are a brave woman. And yes, I have something similarly amazing at home. Of course, I actually finished my horrible mistake before I realized it was a horrible mistake. You have me beat there. You had the sense to realize that the sweater was hideous before you actually finished it.
Posted by: Jennifer at April 6, 2006 06:42 PM
Hilarious! Especially the graph-paper-on-head part. Reminds me of when my sister decided to make me a dress, (I was like 5 years old, she was 12, I think), and so she laid me down on the fabric and drew around me. Needless to say, little as I was at the time, it was still too "snug" to wear. But makes for a funny family story to bring up at least once a year.
Posted by: Mary at April 6, 2006 06:08 PM
I have to laugh at this because it brings back a memory of what happened to me when learning knitting at school in the early 70s. I found knitting boring at that time and so was very proud to have completed several rows of a blue item (think it was a tank top) on top of the ribbing. The teacher took one look and said I'd done the stitches all wrong - thinking back I think I had knitted into the wrong loop and twisted them. I don't remember what happened after that but my mother is also an expert knitter and I didn't enjoy knitting until my mid teens when I found the Golden Hands collection of Sasha doll patterns. Then I took off and have never looked back. And I think I might join the circular jacket knitalong!
Posted by: Gillian Buchanan at April 6, 2006 01:05 PM
I give you credit for having the courage to try to "create" your own sweater and even more courage to model it for us. You go girl!
Posted by: Lisa at April 2, 2006 05:43 PM
Kate,
That wouldn't be the navy blue Wool Ease with flecks of color would it? I am frogging my first personal sweater attempt from 10 years back knit in the very same yarn! :-)
Posted by: Lisa at April 2, 2006 05:36 PM
It's so deja-vu -- this must happen to all knitters.
Posted by: Emy at March 31, 2006 03:58 AM
It could be worse! That color doesn't look too terribly awful.
Posted by: Shannon at March 30, 2006 06:50 PM
Love ya, mean it, but that IS butt-ugly....glad to know knitting tragedies don't only happen to me!
Posted by: Ellen at March 29, 2006 12:48 PM
I just discovered Knitcast last night, and you mentioned this piece in your interview. I can't believe today I got to see it! At least you have something to show for your early days of self-taught knitting. I just have one skein of badly frayed red heart that I kept casting on and ripping off.
Posted by: Susan S-M at March 29, 2006 08:58 AM
too funny!! love this...you go gurl...
Posted by: jae at March 29, 2006 01:56 AM
bravo! my very first sweater was in that exact SAME yarn, but i twisted every stitch so i ended up with a bulletproof sweater that would have fit a 6 year old. the observant will note that there is no mention of this incident on my blog, though i did do a parade of other horribles back in january... thanks for coming clean in public!
Posted by: jenny at March 29, 2006 01:34 AM
OMG, that was the funniest thing I ever read. Especially the part about casting on a bunch of sts until it looked like... enough. hahahaha!
Posted by: grumperina at March 29, 2006 12:27 AM
I've been there too! My first sweater was a burgandy monstrosity made out of red heart acryl-ick that I knit and knit compulsively in the round, even joined the sleeves, and finished the sucker. However, the decreases for the yoke were so puckered that it looked like I had some sort of purposeful strange pattern in a band near the neck. It was awful. Also WAY too big, even though I thought I measured... I think we're seeing a trend here!
Posted by: Jess at March 28, 2006 10:47 PM
I am very impressed that a 16 year old would stick to something long enough to produce that much knitting. And look at how well you knit today! My first project (knit of red-heart ack-crylic) was a midriff top of forest green with an intarsia red heart on the center front. I too had no patience for gauge swatching so the monstrosity wound up too big for me...my mother actually wore it..and I was about 15 or 16 when I made it. Hmmmmm....wonder what ever happened to it? (This was back in the '60's.) I'll bet we all have early projects that we would like to forget, right?
Posted by: Mary Lou at March 28, 2006 04:26 PM
What a great pic Kate! All it's missing is the "ayyyyyyyyyy" to complete the Fonz look. I broke out the graph paper in my early crochet days. Made a template of a sweater shape and just "filled it in" with single crochet. In the end it WAS a sweater...sort of.
Posted by: Jennifer at March 28, 2006 03:49 PM
Are you SURE you can't salvage that???
Posted by: SusanSW at March 28, 2006 02:35 PM
Are you SURE you can't salvage that???
Posted by: SusanSW at March 28, 2006 02:34 PM
Loved the saga, but you're not giving yourself enough credit for the most significant aspect. Your first attempt beyond scarfing was a Kate Gilbert original. Your fate was sealed--in a most wonderful way!
Posted by: Wanda at March 28, 2006 12:41 PM
Listen, I think it's a matter of accessorizing properly -- get a funky belt, and you are set!
Posted by: Gina at March 28, 2006 10:46 AM
Whoa. And I thought my knitted tank top phase was bad. I bow to you.
Posted by: cari at March 28, 2006 09:50 AM
My third sweater was begun in 1990. Intarsia. Eleven colors. Interlocking Greek cross pattern. Dropped shoulders and no shaping.
I knew nothing about fit so the ladies told me I needed a medium. Sounded good to me. I got the UFO out a couple of months ago to investigate the completion of said monstrosity at which point I realized that a "medium" results in a finished measurement of 52 inches. I think it's going to become felted pillows because I'm not seeing 17 inches of ease looking that good on my 5'1" body.
My only consolation is that the "small" was 45 inches.
Posted by: liz at March 28, 2006 08:47 AM
Oh, I think we've all been there. I know I cannot cast the first stone. My first insane knitted piece was a bikini...made of red heart acrylic...one cup could have housed a family of four. Even if I had kept it, I certainly wouldn't model it for fear of burning the retinas of all who saw me.
It was a great laugh to start my day though :)
Posted by: Marnie at March 28, 2006 08:35 AM
Ah, there is now hope for all of us.
Posted by: Debbie at March 28, 2006 08:35 AM
Knowing how you've previously stated that you'd rather throw something away than frog it, I'm surprised you still have that! I recently threw away my first item (never did seam it) that I made from a pattern. I really should have kept it and finished it. It was a mint green baby sweater with a diamond pattern in YOs. It actually was very sweet. And I really shouldn't have thrown it away. I could list about a hundred reasons why. But apparently I wasn't thinking of any of those reasons on the day I made that decision.
Posted by: Laura at March 28, 2006 08:26 AM
Thanks Kate, I needed a laugh. You just might have inspired me to post about some of my long ago knitting disasters. Like you, what did I know of good yarn? Also, like you, I've kept these nasty, hideous unfinished disasters for years and have moved them all over the country with me. The first - my first attempt at tweaking a pattern and my first raglan. When I finished the front and back is when I finally realized that my armholes went about 10" below my HIP! The other disaster was a baby one-piece thing that was to have a hood with bunny ears. It was knit on size 2 or 3 needles and I got all the way to the top of the button placket before I realized that the feet were facing backwards!
All that said, don't feel so bad about your pre-poncho-poncho/sweater!!!!!
Posted by: Sheila at March 28, 2006 08:14 AM
Did your mum bring you that? Dude...
I think I did a very similar thing in mohair in 1985. But I wore the graph paper around my neck.
Posted by: Lee Ann at March 28, 2006 07:10 AM
Very very amusing :)
I was never that confident to just knit on without worrying about all the details (like how many stitches) ...although that doesn't mean I've never suffered from public knitting humiliation!
Posted by: di at March 28, 2006 06:43 AM
off to buy graph paper this afternoon.
did i tell you i have a mullet now? an intentional one?
Posted by: kris at March 28, 2006 03:42 AM
I am loving this! Thanks so much for sharing :)
Posted by: Fannie at March 28, 2006 02:48 AM
graph paper makes everything better.
the impatient ingenuity of your sixteen-year-old self is adorable. i love how you still have this project in possession.
Posted by: meowgirl at March 28, 2006 12:44 AM
Oh, that's hilarious! I've got some awful yarn from my early knitting days, but it never actually got made into anything (well, if you don't count the eyelash yarn from Walmart.....). And as a reformed cross-stitcher, I've spent much, much time with graph paper, but I have never placed a piece on top of my head - maybe I was missing something.....
Posted by: janna at March 28, 2006 12:41 AM
Wow..... that's um.... really hot!
Posted by: Scout at March 28, 2006 12:14 AM



